The Hidden Truth About Recycled Content: 5 Things Challenging Your Sustainability Goals
As sustainability leaders navigate the increasingly complex landscape of recycled materials, understanding the reality behind recycled content claims has become essential. With regulatory pressure intensifying and companies racing to meet ambitious sustainability targets, the gap between commitments and available supply continues to widen. These five critical insights will help you make informed decisions, protect your brand's reputation, and drive meaningful progress toward your sustainability goals.
1. The Supply-Demand Gap Presents Significant Challenges
Recent research reveals a concerning reality: only around 9% of discarded plastics are being recycled globally. Despite decades of awareness campaigns and corporate commitments, this figure has remained largely stagnant. The implications for sustainability managers are significant: corporate commitments to incorporate recycled content in products substantially exceed the actual supply of post-consumer resins (PCR) available in the market.
This supply-demand imbalance creates considerable risk. With limited PCR availability, materials marketed as "recycled content" may not actually consist of genuine post-consumer recycled materials. Companies face the potential of inadvertently greenwashing their products, which undermines sustainability initiatives and exposes organizations to reputational damage. This risk is amplified as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation increasingly requires companies to meet specific recycled content mandates, making verification essential not only for brand protection but for regulatory compliance. As buyers and regulators increasingly scrutinize recycled content claims, confidence in the authenticity of these materials becomes paramount for all participants in the recycling market.
2. Achieving 100% Recycled Content Remains Technically Challenging
Creating products with 100% recycled content is exceptionally difficult from a technical standpoint. However, it's important to recognize that any verified amount of recycled content represents meaningful progress toward circular economy goals and deserves recognition.
Most products require additional components such as additives, pigments, adhesives, or labels that inevitably affect the overall percentage of recycled content. Rather than pursuing unrealistic targets, sustainability managers should focus on maximizing recycled content where technically feasible while maintaining transparency about actual achievements. The critical differentiator lies in third-party certified recycled content, which provides verification of actual percentages and ensures claims can withstand regulatory and stakeholder scrutiny.
3. Contaminants Significantly Impact Recycling Recovery Rates
Even with well-designed recycling programs, achieving 100% material recovery remains unlikely due to contamination issues. Labels, adhesives, caps, food residue, liquids, and other unwanted materials all function as contaminants that interfere with the recycling process.
These contaminants require removal during processing and frequently end up in landfills or waste-to-energy facilities. This highlights why it's essential to design products with recyclability in mind from the start. By designing products and packaging with end-of-life considerations from the outset, organizations can substantially reduce waste generated during recycling and improve overall material recovery rates.
4. Understanding the Distinction Between Pre-Consumer and Post-Consumer Content
Differentiating between pre-consumer and post-consumer recycled content is essential for informed sourcing decisions and accurate marketing claims.
Pre-consumer recycled content consists of materials diverted from the waste stream during the manufacturing process. However, ISO 14021 standards provide an important clarification: internal scrap materials that are simply recycled back into the same manufacturing process do not qualify as recycled content. Many manufacturers incorrectly assume they can claim recycled content by reintegrating their own production scrap, but this does not constitute a valid claim.
Post-consumer recycled content consists of materials generated by end-users that can no longer serve their intended purpose. While both types can be incorporated into products, many green building standards and sustainability certifications provide greater credit for post-consumer material, making it more valuable for meeting specific sustainability targets and certification requirements.
5. Recycled Content Claims Present the Highest Risk for Fraudulent Activity
Recycled content, particularly post-consumer resin, represents the highest-risk area for fraudulent claims within the sustainability sector. As demand continues to outpace supply and price premiums increase, the incentive for misrepresentation grows proportionally.
Third-party certification has evolved from best practice to a fundamental requirement. Independent verification ensures that materials being certified constitute genuine recycled content. Organizations, like GreenCircle Certified, specializing in recycled content certification work to eliminate greenwashing claims from the marketplace, transforming companies into brands that procurement managers and consumers can genuinely trust.
Third-party certification provides:
Comprehensive chain of custody verification
Rigorous testing protocols and documentation
Regular compliance audits
Protection against fraudulent claims throughout the supply chain
Moving Forward: Promoting Circular Economy Principles Through Design
Current challenges stem from decades of product design that failed to consider end-of-life implications. Growing e-commerce, food delivery services, and consumer demand for convenience have accelerated reliance on single-use products and plastics, many of which—including snack food bags and multi-layer plastic pouches—present significant recycling challenges.
Addressing this requires a fundamental shift in product design philosophy. By prioritizing recyclability from the concept stage, implementing rigorous third-party verification of recycled content claims, and supporting closed-loop systems, organizations can drive substantive progress toward circular economy objectives.
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation is rapidly becoming a key driver of this transformation. EPR programs shift the financial and operational responsibility for end-of-life product management from municipalities to producers, creating a direct economic incentive to design for recyclability. As EPR policies expand across North America, Europe, and beyond, companies are increasingly required to meet specific recycled content thresholds, fund recycling infrastructure, and demonstrate verifiable environmental performance. This regulatory trend makes third-party certification not just a best practice, but often a compliance necessity.
The encouraging news is that comprehensive certification programs for recycled content claims, recyclability assessments, and closed-loop products provide the verification infrastructure necessary to meet both regulatory requirements and voluntary sustainability commitments. As EPR legislation continues to evolve and advanced sorting technologies emerge, the infrastructure supporting authentic recycled content continues to strengthen, making verified claims more accessible and credible than ever before.
Ready to understand where your recycled content claims stand?
GreenCircle’s Recycled Content Prep Check is a short, practical snapshot designed to help you assess your readiness, identify potential gaps, and determine what it would take to move forward with confidence.
👉 Take the free Recycled Content Prep Check and see how verification-ready you are.
Be Part of Our Inner Circle
Be the first to get new content, expert tips, and industry updates in your inbox.
We respect your privacy and will never share your information. Unsubscribe anytime.
