EPR Is Here. Is Your Packaging Certified?
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) reporting deadlines are here, fee structures are set, and producers selling packaged goods into any of the seven states with active programs — Oregon, Colorado, California, Minnesota, Maryland, Washington, and Maine — are already obligated, whether they've taken action or not.
What makes EPR complex isn't any single requirement. It's that the regulation touches nearly every part of a business at once: procurement, supply chain, finance, legal, sustainability, and marketing all have skin in the game.
The good news is that the same strategies that keep a business EPR compliant today can meaningfully reduce costs and strengthen brand credibility tomorrow. Getting ahead of it means understanding what's being asked, who needs to be involved, and which tools, including third-party certification, can turn a compliance burden into something you can leverage beyond regulatory compliance.
What is Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)?
Extended Producer Responsibility is a policy framework that places the financial and operational responsibility for end-of-life packaging on the producers who put that packaging into commerce, rather than on municipalities or taxpayers.
The concept has a long track record in Europe and Canada, and it has now taken a firm hold in the United States. According to the Product Stewardship Institute, as of 2026, there are 150 EPR laws across 34 states and the District of Columbia across 22 product categories, with packaging among the fastest-growing areas of legislative activity.
Oregon and Colorado are the most operationally active, with Oregon collecting fees since July 2025 and Colorado's first fees due January 2026. California finalized SB 54 in May 2026 with fee obligations scheduled for January 2027.
EPR is not a single national standard. It is a patchwork of state-level regulations that producers must navigate simultaneously, which makes building a scalable, multi-state compliance strategy essential from the start.
Who is an Obligated Producer Under EPR?
Under most state EPR laws, an obligated producer is any company that introduces packaged goods into commerce within that state. This includes brand owners, importers, and in some cases licensees. Retailers and packaging suppliers are generally not the obligated party, but the producer of the packaged product is.
For example, consider a personal care brand selling shampoo through a major retailer. Under EPR, the brand is the obligated producer, not the company that made the bottle, and not the retailer selling it.
Obligated producers are required to:
Register with a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) – the most prominent being the Circular Action Alliance
Report packaging data by material type and weight for each state where goods are sold
Pay fees based on the type and volume of packaging introduced into each state
Meet recycling, source reduction, and recyclability targets set by each state over time
Non-compliance carries substantial consequences. Penalties across active states range from $100 to $25,000 per day, and the list of registered producers is publicly available, so gaps in registration are visible to regulators and competitors alike.
How EPR Fees Work and Why the Data Behind Them Matters
EPR fees are material-specific and, in several states, adjusted through eco-modulation — a mechanism that rewards packaging with lower environmental impact and penalizes materials that disrupt recycling systems.
Here’s a practical example of how EPR fees can influence packaging decisions. Under Oregon’s fee structure, expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam can carry significantly higher producer fees than fiber-based packaging materials such as corrugated cardboard. Consider two packaging options of the same weight: corrugated cardboard at approximately $0.03/lb versus polystryene foam at approximately $1.08/lb. While both materials may provide effective product protection, the EPS packaging could generate more than 35 times higher EPR fees. For companies moving significant volume, those cost differences can quickly become a meaningful factor in packaging design and material selection.
Colorado adds percentage-based surcharges for materials that interfere with recycling infrastructure, with discounts for materials that have high documented recycling rates. Oregon goes further, offering fee bonuses for producers who conduct life cycle assessments and demonstrate measurable packaging improvements:
Bonus A (certified LCA submission): up to $20,000 in fee reductions
Bonus B (certified LCA demonstrating measurable improvement vs. baseline): up to $50,000 per SKU
Bonus C (shift to reusable or refillable packaging): forthcoming
Third-party certification is what makes these bonuses accessible. A building products manufacturer that eliminated foam and film plastics in favor of corrugated and kraft paper reduced its EPR fee rate from as high as $1.38 per pound to approximately $0.03 per pound, but capturing that outcome required a certified, documented life cycle assessment as evidence of the redesign. That’s where supplier data alone falls short.
Which brings up the challenge most organizations are quietly facing: the data isn't ready. Compliant EPR reporting requires bill-of-materials level detail — the precise weight of the resin, the label, the adhesive, the ink, the closure — not a general description of the package type. Most companies don't have that documentation built out, and the gap cuts across procurement, supply chain, sustainability, legal, and finance simultaneously.
Closing that gap starts with suppliers. Organizations moving fastest on EPR compliance are the ones that have formally updated supplier expectations requiring EPR-ready documentation, bill-of-materials data, and material certifications as standard deliverables. Suppliers who can provide that proactively are becoming preferred partners. Those who can't, create compliance risk for the brands they serve.
But supplier data alone isn't enough. The next question states are asking is whether the claims behind that data can be independently confirmed, and increasingly, the answer has to be yes.
Why Third-Party Certification Is Now a Compliance Tool
Self-declared sustainability claims are increasingly insufficient under EPR frameworks. States are building verification requirements directly into their fee structures and the distinction between a certified claim and an unverified one has direct financial implications.
Supplier documentation creates the paper trail. Third-party certification is what turns that paper trail into a compliant, defensible claim.
GreenCircle Certified offers accredited verification across several areas relevant to EPR compliance and packaging sustainability. Each addresses a distinct compliance need from verifying recycled content and recyclability claims to documenting life cycle improvements and emissions data:
Recycled Content Certification
Verify and document the post-consumer recycled content in your packaging with an auditable chain of custody that meets EPR reporting and fee discount requirements.
As EPR programs expand, third-party verification of post-consumer recycled (PCR) content is becoming a baseline requirement for fee discounts and compliance reporting. Recycled content is a commodity: supply fluctuates, sourcing varies, and traceability is rarely built into standard procurement documentation. Third-party recycled content certification establishes a chain of custody from the material supplier through to the finished product, verifying that PCR content claims are accurate, traceable, and consistent across production.
Reliable recycled content claims depend on verification throughout the supply chain. GreenCircle Certified supports both product manufacturers through GreenCircle Certified Recycled Content Certification and plastic recyclers through the Association of Plastic Recyclers (APR) Recycled Content Certification program. Together, these certifications help provide the documentation needed to substantiate PCR content claims, support EPR fee incentive eligibility, and strengthen confidence in recycled content reporting.
Recyclability Certification
Substantiate on-pack recyclability claims with third-party verified documentation that holds up to evolving state EPR standards.
EPR regulations across multiple states are establishing stricter standards around what can and cannot be labeled as recyclable. Labeling packaging as recyclable without substantiated, third-party-verified evidence creates legal and reputational exposure — and as more states formalize recyclability requirements, that exposure compounds.
Recyclability certification provides the documented, defensible foundation that supports compliant on-pack claims and demonstrates alignment with evolving state recyclability standards.
Product Optimization (LCA)
Certify that packaging improvements have measurably reduced life cycle impacts, turning completed life cycle assessment work into documented, fee-qualifying evidence.
For producers who have completed a life cycle assessment (LCA) and implemented packaging improvements, Product Optimization certification is what makes those improvements count toward EPR fee reductions.
GreenCircle verifies and certifies that changes to a product or its packaging have measurably reduced carbon or life cycle impacts based on product carbon footprint (PCF) or LCA data and verified implemented improvements. Without this certified documentation, the work gets done, but the financial benefit of eco-modulation incentives isn't captured.
Dematerialization
Certify that your packaging delivers the same function with less material, reducing your EPR fee base and documenting source reduction for compliance reporting.
One of the most direct ways to reduce EPR fees is to use less material. Dematerialization certification verifies that a product or its packaging delivers the same function with measurably less mass or fewer material types — a strategy that reduces the volume of packaging reported into state EPR programs and lowers the fee base accordingly.
For producers building scalable, multi-state compliance programs, certified dematerialization claims provide documented proof that source reduction strategies are real and quantifiable.
The Case for Building a Certified EPR Program Now
Large retailers are increasingly requesting EPR-ready packaging documentation from their suppliers. Brands with certified programs are better positioned to meet those requests, qualify for eco-modulation fee discounts, and demonstrate a sustainability story that holds up under both marketing and legal review.
Meeting those demands isn't a one-time effort — it's an ongoing program. The states that are watching today will be obligating producers tomorrow, and the regulations already in place will eventually intensify. Organizations that invest in certified, documented compliance programs now won't be scrambling to catch up. They'll already have the infrastructure, the data, and the defensible claims to meet whatever comes next.
Be Part of Our Inner Circle
Be the first to get new content, expert tips, and industry updates in your inbox.
We respect your privacy and will never share your information. Unsubscribe anytime.
